This a belief going around in my area. I tried to find if there was any records about it. Is this true that the background of developing of Altec 605 is that 604 was too strong to be used in home environment so Altec decided to reduce the magnet size of the 604s and made the sound smoother? So 605 is a better improved speaker for the home hifi user?
Besides, what I read was about 605 was that recording studio engineers didn't like 605 and asked Altec to bring 604s. And actually , because of the failure of introducing of 605s to studio industries , other company such as JBL could get into the recording studio which was almost occupied by Altec before.
It doesn't sound reasonable for me that the 604 was too strong and harsh in high frequency and very difficult to use them at home. But studio engineers liked 604s not 605 and Altec had to continue with 604s.
I haven't listened 605s and don't know how does it sound but most 605 users here say that 605 sounds smoother in high frequency and has more base.
Basically, they say, 604s are excellent speakers but 605 is better in home environment because it is very difficult to deal with 604s at home.
I want to know what is the difference of these two speakers except for the magnet size and efficiency. Was really the 605 developed for home use purpose?
So the 604s has defects when it used at home?
I am using 604bs in 614 cabinets now at my home and I like it very much.
If is different, of course , from Rogers 3\5. Sometimes I feel it is too loud or noisy. Sometimes I feel it lacks high frequency or base.
But, this is the speaker which made me listen to the music. I have to say I was mealy an audio mania before, now I become a music lover after I got 604s.
I am reading, searching everyday about Altec. I've never had this kind of big shock with any other speakers, amplifies etc etc.
And I want to know more about Altec.
Crazy Altecer.




Altecs forever!!!!


Bookmarks